Jacana

ALAIN ATTAR

 

CARRIE CHRISTIAN

 

CLAIRE COUTELLE

 

MICHAEL CUTLIP

 

ETIENNE GELINAS

 

JASON DE GRAAF

 

THIERRY FEUZ

 

VERNE HARRISON

 

KATINA HUSTON

 

CYBELE IRONSIDE

 

MOHSEN KHALILI

 

PENG LIU

 

SOIZICK MEISTER

 

PAUL MORSTAD

 

JAMES OLLEY

 

RUI PIMENTA

 

VERONICA PLEWMAN

 

STEPHAN REUSSE

 

MARC REMBOLD

 

LEAH ROSENBERG

 

MICHAEL ROSENFELD

 

DON RUSSELL

 

MATT SHANE

 

ANNE SIEMS

 

PIM SEKERIS

 

MARNIE SPENCER

 

CAROLINE WEAVER

 

BRAD WOODFIN

STEPHAN REUSSE
by Klaus Honnef

In rendering visible what refuses to be caught by visibility, Art has always been able to get off the ground, no matter whether it was serving the purposes of society or experimenting with horizons of its own choosing. Even when Art ran through a phase labelled as “naturalism” or “realism”, only a few artists would identify with Hippolyte Taine’s, the famous historian’s, postulate that in describing empirical reality, the narrator ought to deny his own existence. To analyse and to apply the laws of visual perception for their own ends was their ambition. They were not content to simulate the visible on a plain surface. In earlier epochs of Western culture they exalted the ideal appearance of the human body in both a physical and a metaphysical sense. In the Middle ages they represented the heavenly salvation of the virtuous and the torments of hell inflicted on the damned in luminous colours and in the most graphic manner. At that, the description of hell produced in many cases the more convincing results; probably because the empirical experience of the times acted as a stimulant on the artist’s imagination. Only when rulers sent ambassadors to sound possibilities of marriage did they enjoin it on the painter accompanying them that he was to represent the prospective bride as close to nature as possible and under no circumstances after the usual manner of court portraits. In such cases, the ruler wished to arrive at his own well-founded judgment. Such simulacra were not considered in terms of artistic value, and only few have survived. Nonetheless, the question of the difference between image and simulacrum laid the ground for the polemic, carefully sustained far into the post-modern era, which concerns the question whether or not artistic value should be conceded to photography – although modernism had started when photography had added a technological variant to and extended the spectrum of traditional worlds of imagery.


-
Klaus Honnef
for catalogue: Stephan Reusse „Works 2003-1982“
ISBN 3-902249-35-8